Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 00:45

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Rihanna’s Father, Ronald Fenty, Dies at 70: Report - Billboard
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Nintendo Switch 2 launch games: Every Switch 2 game available on day one - Video Games Chronicle
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
USMNT vs. Trinidad and Tobago: Starting XI & Lineup Notes - US Soccer
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Subway owner buys popular chicken chain in $1 billion deal - PennLive.com
Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Blue Diamond to close historic midtown Sacramento plant; 600 jobs affected - Sacramento Bee
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Jack Betts, ‘Spider-Man’ Actor and Spaghetti Western Veteran, Dies at 96 - Variety
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What’s next?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.